Author: haroldblackphd

October 6, 2023

Its deer season. I always get a bit melancholy sitting on my ancestors’ land. I am trying to find that rare mature buck and that rarer barren doe. As a result, I have not killed a deer with a bow in four years. But I go anyway on the off chance than one will appear. My mother used to say “You can kill as many deer just sitting watching TV.” Of course, she was right – at least during bow season. 

As I have gotten older I’ve come to appreciate most of the wisdom of my parents. They told us (I had an older brother Charles) many things among them were:

1. Envy is a wasted emotion so
2. Don’t be envious of anyone
3. Make them be envious of you
4. Jealousy is also a wasted emotion
5. Make them be jealous of you
6. I don’t care what you want to be as long as you become the very best that you can be
7. Never make excuses just promise to do better next time
8. Its ok to make a “B” so long as you were trying hard to make an “A”
9. Make an “A” the next time
10. You know what’s right and what’s wrong. Deciding to do wrong will both hurt us and disappoint us (Note: I always asked myself would my parents approve of some action)
11. You are entitled to your own opinion so long as you keep it to yourself and the one I hated the most
12. Your teachers may not always be right but they are your teachers and should be obeyed
13. If you think you were wronged by your teachers then we will discuss it with them and let you know the resolution
14. You do not talk back to adults

Importantly, it being back of the bus days, Dad deliberately moved us from Madison, GA to Atlanta to minimize our contact with whites. He hated the Jim Crow laws (listen to Brenda Russell’s “Against the Law”) and refused to go into places split by race. The mortgage was from a black S&L, the checking accounts at a black bank, the insurance from a black-owned agency. We didn’t go to the downtown theatres because we were confined to the balcony. We didn’t see minor league baseball because of the segregate seating. As a consequence, I never had a conversation with a white person until that awful testy interview with the racist registrar at Georgia. Dad kept telling us that the Jim Crow laws would not be necessary if we were inferior to whites. My brother who was a math genius could not go to Georgia Tech so he went to Purdue, a much better school. Not qualified? When I went to Georgia, Dad said “Show those Crackers who is not qualified”. Hence, we had no sense of inferiority. We knew that the Jim Crow laws existed because whites were scared of us. That is why I had no fear at Georgia. Thanks Dad.

My parents did not drink. Mother made wine from the scuppernongs growing in the backyard and gave them to the folks on the street as Christmas presents. Dad smoked but quit when I was in elementary school. Mom smoked until I was in high school. Neither ever cursed. I never heard them argue. Later I told Mom that it was remarkable that they didn’t argue. She told me that they argued all the time but not in our presence. They would wait until we were asleep and then go into the basement to “discuss” their differences. They did not want us to see anger in the house, only love.

I always chafed at the rules, especially the ones about not questioning adults and not being able to express my opinions. I had a very serious conflict with my father while at Georgia and told him “no” when he told me to apologize to the Air Force ROTC commander who had openly discriminated against me. He told me that if I could not do what he demanded then I was to pack my things because I could not live in his house. He would not pay my way in school and I had to leave. Mother interceded but Dad and I hardly said a word to each other for two the next years. Much later I sat down with him to air out all my pent-up grievances. He didn’t apologize. He didn’t regret a single thing. Rather he said “I was just trying to be a father.” From that point until he died, our relationship warmed. I miss him.

Knoxville Focus

Knoxfocus.com

October 2, 2023

Prior to the Civil War this country was referred to as “the United States are.” Afterwards, it became “the United States is.” Now it may be appropriate to once again refer to the country as a collection of individual states. I seriously believe that within my grandchildren’s lifetime there will be efforts by some states to secede due to irreconcilable differences with those in power at the Federal level. I have a friend who thinks that the Administrative state will thwart any republican president leaving the democrats de facto in power into perpetuity. If that were the case, then certain states would find increasing support to justify secession. The question is whether that secession will be peaceful unlike the attempt in 1861. If part of a state wants to secede and create its own state or join another state, secession is virtually impossible because it requires approval of the state itself. Thus, although Staten Island would like to secede from New York City, the state of New York won’t allow it. The same goes for regions who want to secede from California, Illinois, Virginia, Washington and Oregon. Their state legislatures will veto every effort. Such was not always the case. In the early years of the nation, New York ceded Vermont, Virginia ceded Kentucky, Massachusetts ceded Maine and North Carolina ceded East Tennessee. West Virginia was carved out of Virginia and is an illegal state. The western counties of Virginia were pro-Union and voted against secession. When Virginia seceded, the western counties formed a new Virginia legislature and approved its own secession. The US government recognized the rouge legislature and admitted the new state as West Virginia over the protests of the government in Richmond. In 1871, the Supreme Court in Virginia v. West Virginia upheld the unconstitutional secession as constitutional. Now the western counties of Virginia want to join West Virginia. Although West Virginia approves of such a move, Virginia does not so those counties are stuck with being dominated by the DC suburban counties and liberal Richmond. Another instance involved Texas seceding from Mexico in 1836. Mexico did not recognize the secession and tried to use force to stop it. Legends were made.  Davy Crockett, Jim Bowie, William Travis, the Alamo, Santa Anna, Sam Houston and the Battle of San Jacinto were the result. Texas then petitioned to join the United States and was accepted resulting in the Mexican-American War. I have often wondered what would happen if Alberta which is always at odds with the government in Ottawa would try to secede from Canada and join the United States. Would the congress vote to accept them and if it did, would Canada threaten war?

The esteemed Justice Scalia said “If there was any constitutional issue resolved by the Civil War, it is that there is no right to secede.” There is little chance that any effort by a state to leave the union would get the approval of both houses of congress and three fourths of the states. However, I do wonder if there were serious civil discord within a state (or states) that became violent against Federal authorities and that state’s national guard were poised to fight against the Federal government, if there might not be a mutual agreement to part. Perhaps we should revert back to the Articles of Confederation which were adopted by the Congress in 1777 that bound the 13 colonies to a weak central government. There are reasons why that arrangement did not work in 1777 but might work in 2023. Switzerland is a modern confederation made up of 26 cantons and a relatively weak central government. It seems to function as a nation. If our differences are truly irreconcilable then perhaps a confederation is our only hope to survive as a nation.

September 28, 2023

Did you watch the second republican debate? Me neither.

Have you kept up with the latest government shutdown kerfuffle? Me neither.

I have been disappointed in the republicans in the House. They control the nation’s purse strings. All spending bills must originate in the House. You would think with the crisis at the southern border that the republicans would shut down all other business until they force Biden to do something to limit the flow of illegals into the country. Recall at last count illegals from over 120 countries have come into the country. Yet, sadly, they have done nothing and the border remains open to all.

I am also disappointed that the republicans have not taken forceful action to stop Biden’s war on stuff. Air conditioners, gas furnaces, weed eaters, lawn mowers, gas ovens, light bulbs, internal combustion engines. Generators, the war on oil and gas all will make us poorer because the alternatives are more expensive and less efficient. Imagine the impact on the poor. More welfare anyone? Why can’t the House republicans figure out a way to rein in all the out of control federal agencies?

Its no secret that I dislike Donald Trump. He is a small vindictive bitter man. His close supporters should have shut off his twitter machine long ago. I related what he said about Pelosi. His vitriol is never ending. He lashed out at General Mark Miley and said that the General’s speaking to the Chinese deserved the death penalty. He said that Biden was being controlled by the “Fascists in the White House” – Jill and Hunter are Fascists? He advocated an investigation of the “fake news” media for its “knowingly dishonest and corrupt coverage.” He also basically indicated that if he becomes president that the homes of democrat senators will be raided. Essentially, Trump wants to keep the “Justice” Department weaponized against political opponents. Can the nation stand four more years of Trump? Can the nation survive four more years of Biden?

I was sent this twitter posting and I hope the author – Right Wing Dad – doesn’t mind me posting it.

“So let me get this straight, you support a man who banned bump stocks, cheated on all three wives (the current one hasn’t been seen in months and wants nothing to do with Trumps campaign), trips with Epstein, donated to Clinton and Harris campaigns, uses donor funds to pay legal bills, friends with Lindsey Graham, spent more than any president, 4000+ personal lawsuits, used to be a Democrat, endorsed actual RINO republicans, praised WEF, handed the country over to Fauci and gave him a presidential accommodation on the way out which he lied about, praises the vaccine and claims he is the father of it and warp speed, praised Newsom and Cuomo, all his horrible hires including Christopher Wray, preferred Stacey Abrams to Kemp, supported Disney, pro trans, claimed he would send more money to Ukraine if Russia didn’t cooperate, said he would drain the swamp, build the wall, and lock up Hilary and didn’t do any of it, can’t say whether a man can become a woman, and said a 6 week heartbeat bill was terrible and he would try to make democrats happy? You aren’t conservative or America first.”

Did you see where AOC blamed Marco Rubio for the explosion of Venezuelans across our southern border? Yes Marco Rubio and not Nicolas Maduro. She said it was the sanctions favored by Rubio that was causing the economic catastrophe that is Venezuela and not the repressive socialist regime. As Elon Musk said “She is not that smart.”

The dems, searching for any excuse, want to investigate Clarence Thomas for flying on a billionaire’s plane. Well are they going to investigate George Soros’ funding of five socialist democrats’ junket to South America?

The United Auto Workers are selectively striking the US automakers. They want to work 32 hours a week and get paid for 40. They want a considerable increase in salaries and benefits. They contend that the automakers have reaped record profits and want a bigger share of the pie. One GM official agreed that profits were high but that GM had invested more in EVs than it had made in profits so the money wasn’t there for such dramatic increases in salaries. In essence, GM is saying that it is investing the money in vehicles that will result in fewer autoworkers because EVs require fewer workers.

The autoworkers also complained about the large salaries paid to the heads of the auto companies. Mary Barra at GM made $28.98 million in 2022 of which $14.62 million were in stock grants that vest over three years. Ford’s Jim Farley made $21 million of which $15.14 is in stock grants. Fiat Chrysler’s CEO Mike Manley made 13.28 million euros. A lot of money yes but a lot of responsibility. I wonder if the UAW’s Shawn Fain and his workers could manage such an enterprise. Unions are outraged over CEO compensation. But the Bengal’s Joe Burrow is making $55 million a year to throw a football and the Laker’s Anthony Davis earns $60 million to dunk a basketball. And they don’t have to manage thousands of employees and run a multibillion dollar business. Why hasn’t the left been outraged by the salaries paid athletes?

Did you see where Ibram X. Kendi’s anti-racism center at Boston University is collapsing. It initially received over $43 million since 2020 and now is laying off workers. The center produced only one small research paper compared to other centers at the university that have less funding and more production. What happened to the money? Kendi is not noted for his scholarship. As I pointed out previously, he is supposed to be an expert on racism but struggles to define it. His academic work is embarrassingly bad. He has been called a grifter. He has been called a race hustler. I won’t call him either. He simply exploited white guilt. If white folks are fools enough to send him money, he would be a fool not to take it.

If Joe Biden were not president they would confine him to a home. 

Knoxville Focus

knoxfocus.com

September 25, 2023

Knoxville’s mayor is said to favor rent controls as a “solution” to housing affordability. She, like most progressives ignore Santayana’s “Those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it.” Rent controls are one of the few things that most economists agree on: it is bad. So bad in fact that the Swedish socialist Gunnar Myrdal said “Rent control has in certain Western countries constituted, maybe, the worst example of poor planning by governments lacking courage and vision.” Another Swedish economist Assar Lindbeck stated, “In many cases rent control appears to be the most efficient technique presently known to destroy a city—except for bombing.” Actually, Lindbeck’s comment was an understatement. Consider that after the Viet Nam war, the Vietnamese foreign minister Nguyen Co Thach said that controls had artificially encouraged demand and discouraged supply. House rents had been kept low that all the houses in Hanoi had fallen into disrepair. “The Americans couldn’t  destroy Hanoi, but we have destroyed our city by very low rents. We realized it was stupid and that we must change policy,” he said.

The progressives have yet to realize the stupidity of their ways. Like any other price, rents are set by the market. Rent controls constitute a maximum rent that can be charged. If the controls are set above what the market dictates, then it will not have any impact. For example, suppose rent controls were $20,000 per month. They would not have an effect in the Knoxville market. However, that rent would be well below the most expensive rentals in New York where one apartment lists for $170,000 a month. For rent controls to have any effect, the rent must be set at an amount below what the market dictates. The average rent in Knoxville is $1,600 per month. This is the average for all rental units from studios to multiple bedrooms. Let’s assume that the mayor deems this amount to be too high and gets the city council to vote to lower the rent to a maximum of $1,000 on any rental. Wouldn’t that be wonderful? Well no. Those units that rented for less than $1,000 would find that their rents will go up as renters who are paying more than $1,000 would seek lower cost apartments. Those renters who were paying less than $1,000 would find their rents increasing and many could end up homeless, increasing homelessness in the city. Many more expensive units would be converted into condos or co-ops circumventing the controls altogether. As has been the case elsewhere, units would fall into disrepair as landlords would defer or stop maintenance. Research has shown that in rent controlled cities, the housing stock deteriorates and property values fall as the quantity and quality of the properties fall. The building of new units declines and monies that once went to build apartments go elsewhere in the real estate market not under controls such as condos and commercial buildings. It has been estimated that in New York City, more than 30,000 apartments are abandoned annually. Researchers find that “Rent control has destroyed entire sections of sound housing in New York’s South Bronx and has led to decay and abandonment throughout the entire five boroughs of the city.”

Those tenants who are residing in a rent controlled apartment obviously benefit, although the building may suffer from decreased upkeep and maintenance. The tenants seldom move. A good friend of mine lived in a rent controlled apartment in Washington, DC. where the controls only apply to those in place. She continued to rent the apartment even after she had moved to another state. Her landlord finally offered her a substantial amount to give up the apartment so he could rent it out at a rent three times higher than what she was paying. The DC case is not an isolated one. Economic research has shown that the imposition of rent controls has short term benefits to those in place by keeping their rents artificially low. However, the controls lower property values. There is a study of Cambridge, Massachusetts that estimates that property values fell by $2 billion after the imposition of controls. Interestingly, the values fell not only on the rent controlled properties but also on the surrounding neighborhoods. 

These are the facts. Rent controls is stupid policy, but since when did progressives ever heed facts?

Knoxville Focus

knoxfocus.com

September 18, 2023

I love baseball. Thus far my two favorite teams, the Atlanta Braves and the Baltimore Orioles have the best record in their respective leagues. The Braves represent my home town – even though their ballpark is not in Atlanta. The Cobb County Braves? But then the “New York” Giants/Jets play in New Jersey. The Orioles are a favorite from when I lived in DC which had no baseball – the Washington Senators having morphed into the Texas Rangers. So I went to Baltimore for baseball.

The Braves are a holdout, thus far resisting all pressure to change their name. However, their Triple-A team in Gwinnett is now the “Stripers” and their Class-A club in Rome has announced that it will no longer be the Braves leaving the Double-A club in Mississippi as the only one with the Braves name. Hopefully, the Braves will remain the Braves. 

The Washington Redskins after saying it would never change its name, folded under relentless pressure and became the Washington Football Club and then the Commanders. I guess they could now be called the Washington Commies. The Cleveland Indians became the Guardians. What is interesting about the name Guardians is that the last four letters are the same as the ones in Indians. Thus, Cleveland kept part of the name after all. What is even more interesting is that a Native American group is threatening to boycott the Commanders if they don’t change their name back to Redskins. And the name of the group is the Native American Guardians Association! I kid you not. In a letter to the Commanders, the group said “At this moment in history, we are formally requesting that the team revitalize its relationship with the American Indian community by (i) changing the name back to ‘The Redskins’ which recognizes America’s original inhabitants and (ii) using the team’s historic name and legacy to encourage Americans to learn about, not cancel, the history of America’s tribes and our role in the founding of this Great Nation.” The group has over 100,000 signatures on a petition to change the name.

The irony is overwhelming. The Cleveland Indians change their name to the Guardians because the cancel culture deemed “Indians” as being offensive. But Native Americans also call themselves Guardians. Is that not offensive as well? Then the Native Americans who were supposed to be offended by “Redskins” are demanding that the Commanders change their name back to Redskins or else be boycotted. You can’t make this stuff up.

Note that all the supposedly derogatory nicknames connote bravery and stature rather than scorn and derision. Yes the Atlanta Braves once had a tepee in the outfield and a mascot named Chief Nok-a-homa who did a war dance every time a Brave hit a home run. They also had a laughing Indian on their sleeves. But all that is gone. The baseball team that preceded the Braves were a minor league team called the Atlanta Crackers. So why weren’t white folks offended? What is hilarious is that the Atlanta Negro league team was known as the Black Crackers. 

What about the name Rebels? Here in East Tennessee we have the West High Rebels and the Maryville High Red Rebels. I am truly shocked that those names still exist because much of East Tennessee was pro-Union and these high schools disrespect their ancestors who wore blue. Of course, we still have the Ole Miss Rebels. When I went to the University of Georgia, the band was called the Dixie Redcoat Marching band and played Dixie after the National Anthem. I auditioned for the band having been offered 5 band scholarships out of high school. The band director acknowledged my talent but said that I could not be in his band. The football games looked like a Ku Klux Klan rally with all the confederate flags. All the tailgaters flew rebel flags. I went to all the home football games and was the only black face in the stadium not carrying a mop or a broom. At the games I had rebel flags waved in my face while the wavers yelled obscenities and showered me with debris. Is it any wonder that I hate the rebel flag? Twenty years ago I turned down an interview for a deanship at Ole Miss because of all their rebel nonsense. However, all that stuff is gone. Ole Miss’ football and basketball teams are now mostly black. Once watching a basketball game with Ole Miss versus Mississippi State, all ten players were black. At one point when Ole Miss got a rebound the announcer said “Here come the Rebels!” My feeling is that if they aren’t bothered by being called “Rebels” then why should I be offended for them? 

September 19, 2023

Its fall and bow season in Georgia. Its when I spend an inordinate amount of time in the woods. Venison is the only red meat I have eaten since 1971. I spend a good deal of time looking at deer, but only if the deer oblige. I have not killed a deer with a bow in three seasons. Its because I do not break up family units. The does have fawns with them and although the fawns are weaned I will not shoot the doe. I wait until the rut comes in November when the does chase away the fawns. I do not shoot immature bucks under 6 points. Opening day I could have shot a 4 pointer and a nice 6 pointer. I passed. Georgia allows you to take 2 bucks and I was not going to use one of my tags on the 6 pointer. However, if I still have a tag remaining in January at the end of the season, I would take that deer. The same thing happened last year. I passed on young bucks early in the season and did not see a shooter the entire season, except for a big 10 pointer 85 yards away in bow season well out of range. So here are my axioms of the hunt. If you have any, please add to the list.

As always, thank you for reading my musings. I sincerely appreciate you. 

HB’s Axioms of the Hunt

1. The wind will always be at your back (this is different from running where the wind is always in your face).

2. If by some miracle the wind is in your face and you suddenly hear a deer, the wind will shift to your back.

3. Murphy says that “if it can go wrong, it will”. Hunters know that Murphy was an optimist.

4. Deer will always pick the least assessable place to die.

5. If your gun (or bow) breaks, your 42 blade leatherman’s tool will not have a tool that fixes it.

6. When you take it go get it fixed, the repairman will say “In my 30 years I have never seen this happen.”

7. In bow season the deer will be in muzzleloader range. In muzzleloader season the deer will be in gun range. In gun season, the deer will be no where to be found.

8. If you can shoot a doe you will only see does with fawns.

9. If you can only shoot a buck, you will be overrun with does.

10. Deer calls never work. However, the best way to call a deer call is to take a leak.

11. Anyone who claims to have success grunting and rattling is lying.

12. If you see the buck of a lifetime walking down a path, you will only have a lefthanded shot (if you are righthanded and vice versa).

13. If you see the buck of a lifetime and you are bow hunting, the arrow will fall off the rest when you draw.

14. If you hunt a road where deer always cross, they will only cross when you are looking in the other direction.

15. If the outfitter has a success rate of 100%, it will be lower when you leave.

16. Animals shrink if you shoot them.

17. If you only shoot deer 8 points or better, you will only see six pointers and spikes.

18. Deer only look up if you are in a tree stand.

19. A turkey always struts one foot past the exact distance that number 6 shot can travel.

20. Camo is about as effective as a deer with a sofa painted on its side can hide in your living room.

21. Hunting clothing billed as no-scents makes no sense.

22. Buck lures only to attract hunters to buy them.

23. The only hunters who swear by grunting and rattling for bucks are the ones who sell them.

24. Primos calls if they work at all must only work on Mississippi deer and turkeys.

25. If you leave your stand at noon, the deer will walk by at 12:01.

26. The only purpose of scouting before the season is to find out where the deer were.

27. A person who looks down their nose and sneers “You kill bambi!” isn’t worth knowing.

28. If you go on a hunting trip with a group, expect to be the only one who doesn’t kill anything.

29. If you are hunting your own land without seeing anything all day and suddenly you hear something coming down a path, it will be your dog.

30. No woman is worth your time unless she thinks you look cute in camo.

31. Do I have more success stalking or still hunting? Neither.

32. Is the best time to hunt early, midday or late? No.

33. Deer will always walk down the path you are not hunting.

34. Camo only works if there are no deer around.

35. Anyone who tells you that a deer smells better than a person is obviously a European.

36. Anyone who asks you why do you own so many different caliber rifles is obviously stupid because it doesn’t make sense to own ten rifles of the same caliber.

37. Since camo wearers look like trees and grass, I guess this makes them environmentalists.

38. Most muzzleloaders were designed to hangfire only when a big deer shows up.

39. That Al Gore rather than the inventor of the Loggy Bayou climbing stand was awarded a Nobel prize is a travesty.

40. My favorite t-shirt says “Conservation through incompetence.”

41. If God didn’t want you to kill deer he wouldn’t have invented the pickup truck.

42. If God didn’t want you to hunt in the cold rain, he wouldn’t have invented GoreTex.

43. If Al Gore got the Nobel prize for inventing GoreTex, then I guess I am ok with it.

44. Since I have never seen a woman who looks like a Victoria Secret’s model, I presume that all about those women are fakes, the product of computer imaging. Similarly, videos that show bucks grunted and rattled-in are fakes.

45. Those who can smoke in a tree stand and deer will walk by even though the wind is wrong and seem to kill big deer every time are the chosen few – of which I am not one. Maybe I should start smoking.

46. A person who claims not to like venison has never eaten my cooking.

47. Jerky is not a food since it cannot be broken down by saliva and chewing. It must be swallowed whole.

48. That jerky is not a food was proven when after I tried to eat it, I gave it to my dogs – who also refused to eat it.

49. Just like when I fish I only catch small fish (I’m a small fish specialist), I only see immature deer (which I let walk).

50. Anyone who says that if you kill a trophy animal every time you hunt then it would not be fun is a fool.

51. The hunter the outfitter describes as being “the luckiest hunter I have ever seen” will always be a person in camp. That person will not be you.

52. Recurve bowhunters are snobs and are hunting’s equivalents of fly fishermen.

53. The longest week I ever spent in my life was in a camp in Alberta hunting for bear and all the other hunters shot recurves.

54. There are 6 things that every bow hunter must do in order to shoot accurately. When a trophy deer approaches you will do five of them.

55. If you believe that nonsense about buying all that expensive no scents gear so you can “Forget the Wind – Just Hunt”, let someone release your dogs one hour after you go in the woods.

56. Game cameras tell you where to hunt at 2:03 in the morning.

57. The one hour before sunup is the longest time of the hunt – much longer than the 5 hours or so that follow.

58. Nothing is more satisfying than being able to furnish your own food.

59. Sure you can kill just as many deer sitting at your kitchen table as you usually do in the woods, but coming home even empty handed to your dogs makes it all worthwhile.

60. Venison is the only red meat I eat – provided I killed it myself.

61. My dogs have always been fed a mixture of kibble and venison. Last year I only killed one deer and had to feed them lean ground chuck. They wouldn’t eat it so I gave it to a local food bank.

62. I’ve hunted plains game in South Africa, bear in Canada, elk in New Mexico, red stag in Argentina and seriously big deer near Eagle Pass, Texas. But nothing beats being at the family farm hunting on the lands of my ancestors.

You can’t make this stuff up

Former President Donald Trump offered his latest criticism of President Joe Biden on Friday, warning the “cognitively impaired” incumbent would lead the country into “World War II” if he is reelected next year.

Oops.

Then there is Joe Biden:

“We’ve seen record lows in unemployment particularly — and I’ve focused on this my whole career — particularly for African Americans and Hispanic workers and veterans, you know, the workers without high school diplomas,” 

Oops.

Biden’s White House staff did their usual when they released a revised statement: “We’ve seen record lows in unemployment particularly — and I’ve focused on this my whole career — particularly for African Americans and Hispanic workers and veterans, you know, and the workers without high school diplomas.”

The White House probably has someone employed full time just to amend and correct Biden’s gaffes. I wonder what they did with the remarks when he compared the devastation of the fires in Lahaina to a kitchen fire in his house in Delaware where he claimed he almost lost his cat and Corvette.

Of course, Biden has a long history of making racist remarks. Remember when he said that Hispanics were reluctant to get the COVID vaccine because they were afraid that they would be deported? Or that blacks were afraid of the vaccine because “They are used to being experimented on—the Tuskegee Airmen and others.” Here his addled brain mixed the Tuskegee syphilis experiment with the famed Tuskegee airmen.

Can you imagine the reaction if Trump said this?

I could list a 100 more but I’ve gone over this ground before. Biden is merely carrying on the proud democrat tradition of racism. From supporting slavery to the Ku Klux Klan, to racist southern politicians to national figures like Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson, Joe Biden is just continuing this sad tradition. What is as shameful is that the so-called legacy media has not taken him to task and has help in the pitiful excuses made for his statements. Again, the democrats and the media ran Trent Lott out of Washington for eulogizing Strom Thurman yet Biden eulogized Robert Byrd, the West Virginia senator who was a member of the Ku Klux Klan and somehow he remained in the senate and is now president. Some say this is a double standard but I say it is no standard except provide cover and excuses for democrats. 

I am at a lost to explain why blacks continue to support Biden. But then Alabama blacks voted for George Wallace too.

Biden owes his nomination to James Clyburn of South Carolina. Biden had made a poor showing in the primaries until Clyburn got out the black vote in the South Carolina primary. I think that Clyburn knew that Bernie Sanders would lose to Trump and the dems only hope was Biden. I think also that Clyburn expected something from Biden and that was to nominate Michelle Childs, a black South Carolina judge, to the Supreme Court. Childs even had the backing of Lindsey Graham. But she was trashed by the left as being too moderate and too corporate. Biden caved and nominated Brown Jackson instead. Clyburn, being a good democrat has been silent and was probably placated when Childs was nominated to the DC circuit court of appeals. But I bet he was not happy with Biden’s betrayal.

That would be a natural segue into comparing the Trump impeachments with the Biden impeachment inquiry where the media claims that there is “no evidence.” But I resist relating the obvious.

I can only say “Oops.”

These two comments came to my email and both gave me permission to publish. I thank them very much for commenting and I thank you very much for reading. Enjoy!

Dr. Black, I enjoyed the subject article and, as a gasoline car guy, I really have to wonder what the underlying motivation is to outlaw internal combustion engines. Dr. Jordan Peterson states, “Climate Change is the Progressives get out of jail free card”, and I tend to believe that. Let’s face it, anything “bad” can be attributed to “climate change” via a single step (hurricanes) or multiple steps (migration, bad grades, hangnails, etc). It’s the perfect enemy, it cannot be: defined, located or defend itself! 

I recently purchased a 2023 Camry powered by a 4cyl gasoline engine that gets 40+ mpg on the highway and 30+ around town. It’s America’s most reliable car and, unlike EVs, there are parts in every small city to repair it. I drive only 3,000-5,000 miles per year and the engine is good for 300,000 miles before it needs to be rebuilt. I figure that I have another 60-100 years with this car (I’m 58 now). 

My lawnmower is a 20 year old Craftsman that runs fine and I’ve only had to repair some rust in the deck, which will eventually need to be replaced if the parts are available. Plan B is to simply purchase a brand new gasoline mower now and leave it in the box until it’s needed. My worry is that the EPA/DoE will require battery only mowers to be sold in all 50 states, since they generally follow California’s lead on all things “green”. California no longer allows the sale of gasoline powered mowers.

I often get puff piece articles on Facebook stating how great EVs are and that there are Government subsidies that I can use to potentially afford one. If EVs are so great, why aren’t people waiting in lines for them (e.g. latest iPhone or “must have” electronic gadget) and why the need for Government subsidies? Shouldn’t they be flying off the lots by themselves?

When I see folks comment on the puff piece articles  stating how great their EVs and how they drive them for mere pennies, I have to laugh. I’ve run the numbers and it simply does not make economic sense for me. EVs are rich mans’ virtue signaling toys. I don’t see grandma trading in her 2000 Buick for a $66,000 EV to save the world. They are not economically feasible – yet.  

Every current and prospective EV owner should ask themselves four simple questions: a) if not for the hysteria over “climate change” (aka greenhouse effect, hole in the ozone layer, global warming, etc.) would anyone be driving an electric vehicle today?; b) if every driver in the entire world switched to an EV tomorrow, would there still be: species extinction, hurricanes, wild fires, droughts, famines, floods, tornadoes, earth quakes, rising seas, migration, and wars?; c) if EVs are so economically viable and the  demand is so high, shouldn’t EVs be flying off the lots in a supply and demand business model without the need for the US Government provided tax incentives and other rebates?, and; d) if “climate change” is such an existential threat to mankind, why do the world’s leaders and “climate change” advocates continue to jet off to Davos, Glasco and other exotic locales, to discuss “climate change”, instead of simply meeting via ZOOM?

The typical response I get is namecalling. You know you have them stumped when they instantly resort to namecalling. 

Sincerely, CC

Another Comment

Dear Dr. Black,

I was quite disappointed while reading your article on EVs in the Knoxville Focus today. So disappointed in fact, I was inspired enough to send you an email! I believe that for ideas to be made better they must be challenged, and with argument we creep closer to the truth. So, in this email I will counter your article on EVs and explain why they are the future.

Two years ago when looking at the range on Tesla EVs, I noticed that most of their long range models fall somewhere between 300-400 miles. But as a gas car driver, range means nothing to me! We currently just drive until its empty, stop at a gas station and think nothing of it. So I started an experiment, in which I drive my tank until empty and track how many miles I get (I encourage you to do this with your own car, I always wait to fill up until the empty light comes on). Without fail, I have reset my trip odometer after every gas station fillup on my 2017 Kia Forte 5. So after two years of data what did my average in town driving range end up as? My average is around 325 miles, matching the range of EV cars already on the market today.

While I cannot argue your point about EVs being ugly since it is comes down to personal taste, I would like to give insight into why they look the way they do. For the first time in a long time, automakers are having to worry about the drag coefficient of their vehicles. With gas cars having an MPG figure and not a range figure, it was hard for consumers to really compare vehicles in a meaningful way. But with the range number being directly comparable across vehicles, they have to make sure it is a respectable number. One of the easiest ways to increase efficiency in the vehicles is through the pursuit of aerodynamics, which by having a more sleek frontal area there is less air resistance. But I am not here to give you a physics lesson, you can attend one at UT!(Does former faculty get into lectures for free?) Speaking of physics, fuel economy also goes down for gas vehicles in extreme cold and heat as well! I know that was one of your points of contention in your article.

The most exciting part of EVs for the consumer is the long term development potential they they have. The Ford Model T came out in 1908, with Fords website claiming its MPG at 13-21 MPG. According to the EPA, the average MPG of a car in 2020 was 25.4 MPG. So in the best case after 112 years of development cars have gained 12.4 MPG, worst case only 4.4 MPG. The point I am trying to make, is that the development of EV technology is at its very early stage. The current EVs now rival the range of gas cars at the beginning of their development cycle, and by the end we may see ranges of 600 miles as you said! Here is a example for the development cycle: The gas car started at zero and at its peak efficiency it got to ten, the EV started at six and one fully developed can get to fifteen.

One final point is how the EV is beneficial to the consumers wallet. Not currently, but in time we will see EVs be cheaper to their gas counterparts. Why? Electric vehicles have fewer parts, and compared to an internal combustion engine, their motors are much less complex. I have read estimates that EVs have less than half of the total parts compared to their ICE counterparts. Finally, with electric energy Americans will no longer be held by the OPEC oils cartels. We will no longer be dependent on the Middle East, and theoretically will now be able to avoid wars over resources. Would the US have spent so much time fighting in the middle east if there were no oil interests there? One can wonder…

We don’t have it figured out, we are at the start of a new journey. But I believe that in the long term, renewable energy sources will be better for America. I appreciate you for writing in an open forum and taking the time to read my rebuttal.

Thanks, Mason B.

Mason B seems to forget the replacement cost for a battery, $3,000 to $20,000 depending on the model, with life span of 8 to 12 years. The average cost of a EV $64,000 which is out of the reach for an average American. The weight of he EV is hundreds to thousands of lbs more than an internal combustion, causing more ware on our road system plus tires and breaks will need replacing faster.
Another problem is the damage to the earth by mining the minerals , using slave labor, for the batteries which is controlled by China, which also uses slave labor. The fact everything involved with production of the EV batteries are paid by companies that knowingly those funds will go to the CCP to build their military.
Those that buy the EV gives them a good feeling but they forget the costs to our country’s security, earth, roadways and people slaving to mine these minerals.

From Lottie1924

Knoxville Focus

September 11, 2023

Why are most EVs so ugly? 

Have you seen the new KIA EV SUV? It dethrones the Mustang and Teslas as the ugliest SUV. As much as I love Porsches their EV is really ugly. Its paint jobs are awful reminding me of Pepto Bismol.

Those in the EV camp are crowing that the new agreement to have additional manufacturers given access to Tesla’s charging network solves the problem of range anxiety. It does not. Charging networks do not address the problem of limited range. Until that is addressed, EVs will be no more than second car commuting vehicles. Also, the bigger the EV (SUVs) the lower the range, the heavier the batteries and the greater negative impact on the environment.

World governments’ all-in EV strategies are increasingly stupid. Outlawing the sale of gas/diesel engines before charging networks are on line, before the energy grid can handle the increased demands while severely damaging the environment in the name of saving the planet only makes sense if you follow the money. 

Lithium batteries explode and the fire is difficult to extinguish. The mandating of EVs has ignored the problem of rare earth materials in the batteries. China is seeking to dominate the market while the Biden administration is denying permits for mines in the US. How much money did Hunter get from the Chinese?

The innovation in battery technology is the use of sodium rather than lithium. They solve range anxiety with ranges in excess of 600 miles. They solve the rare earth problem being readily accessible and cheap. 

I have a close friend who has bought into the “climate change is our greatest existential threat” dogma. But he drives a gas powered Mercedes convertible that he loves and will never buy a Tesla because he dislikes Elon Musk intensely.

I have nothing against EVs. I welcome diversity to the marketplace and the expansion of choice to consumers. I just want change to be market driven rather than being forced down the throat of consumers by the zealots who occupy power in governments, banks, and investment firms. 

I admire Elon Musk for his determination to make a successful product. I have a friend who has an Audi EV. He crows about its performance. It is as fast as a Porsche turbo. I just hope he doesn’t go 0-60 in 3.5 seconds down Kingston Pike. 

I wonder why Tesla drivers don’t flick their lights since they all belong to the same cult.

EVs lose about 30 percent of their range in cold winter climates. They lose about 30 percent of their range in extreme heat. So don’t buy one if you live in Minnesota or Arizona.

There was an incongruous headline saying that Ford was cutting the price of its “popular” EV truck by $10,000. If the truck were popular then Ford would be raising the price not lowering it. 

EV trucks are a vanity item. They cannot tow or haul without losing significant range.

The Biden administration has added gas generators to the bad for the environment list. This will adversely impact all those campers who love to camp off grid using solar power and gas generators to power their rigs. 

The first cybertruck from Tesla has just been produced. It is plagued with the same manufacturing problems that characterize Teslas, namely ill fitting panels. Teslas are rightly lauded for their innovative technology so why can’t they fix their manufacturing issues?

What if we refuse to buy EVs even if the governments ban diesel and gas engines? I predict a huge growth in the used car market as consumers rebel against the dictates of the misguided left.

I am wondering how much of these harmful regulations can be reversed by another administration? Much like Biden repealed almost anything associated with Trump during the first days of his tenure, a less zealous administration can be expected to stop the green mandates once it is in office.

I still can’t figure out why the UAW funds Democrats who are intent on destroying so many jobs in the automobile industry. Can they possibly be that stupid?

Comments:

Dr. Black, I enjoyed the subject article and, as a gasoline car guy, I really have to wonder what the underlying motivation is to outlaw internal combustion engines. Dr. Jordan Peterson states, “Climate Change is the Progressives get out of jail free card”, and I tend to believe that. Let’s face it, anything “bad” can be attributed to “climate change” via a single step (hurricanes) or multiple steps (migration, bad grades, hangnails, etc). It’s the perfect enemy, it cannot be: defined, located or defend itself! 

I recently purchased a 2023 Camry powered by a 4cyl gasoline engine that gets 40+ mpg on the highway and 30+ around town. It’s America’s most reliable car and, unlike EVs, there are parts in every small city to repair it. I drive only 3,000-5,000 miles per year and the engine is good for 300,000 miles before it needs to be rebuilt. I figure that I have another 60-100 years with this car (I’m 58 now). 

My lawnmower is a 20 year old Craftsman that runs fine and I’ve only had to repair some rust in the deck, which will eventually need to be replaced if the parts are available. Plan B is to simply purchase a brand new gasoline mower now and leave it in the box until it’s needed. My worry is that the EPA/DoE will require battery only mowers to be sold in all 50 states, since they generally follow California’s lead on all things “green”. California no longer allows the sale of gasoline powered mowers.

I often get puff piece articles on Facebook stating how great EVs are and that there are Government subsidies that I can use to potentially afford one. If EVs are so great, why aren’t people waiting in lines for them (e.g. latest iPhone or “must have” electronic gadget) and why the need for Government subsidies? Shouldn’t they be flying off the lots by themselves?

When I see folks comment on the puff piece articles  stating how great their EVs and how they drive them for mere pennies, I have to laugh. I’ve run the numbers and it simply does not make economic sense for me. EVs are rich mans’ virtue signaling toys. I don’t see grandma trading in her 2000 Buick for a $66,000 EV to save the world. They are not economically feasible – yet.  

Every current and prospective EV owner should ask themselves four simple questions: a) if not for the hysteria over “climate change” (aka greenhouse effect, hole in the ozone layer, global warming, etc.) would anyone be driving an electric vehicle today?; b) if every driver in the entire world switched to an EV tomorrow, would there still be: species extinction, hurricanes, wild fires, droughts, famines, floods, tornadoes, earth quakes, rising seas, migration, and wars?; c) if EVs are so economically viable and the  demand is so high, shouldn’t EVs be flying off the lots in a supply and demand business model without the need for the US Government provided tax incentives and other rebates?, and; d) if “climate change” is such an existential threat to mankind, why do the world’s leaders and “climate change” advocates continue to jet off to Davos, Glasco and other exotic locales, to discuss “climate change”, instead of simply meeting via ZOOM?

The typical response I get is namecalling. You know you have them stumped when they instantly resort to namecalling. 

Sincerely, CC